Philosophical Differences Between Western
and Chinese Medicine
(Part 2-Traditional Chinese Medicine)
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is an
empirical medicine and was developed in the old days in the absence of
systemic scientific knowledge. Thus, it is a product of the accumulated
clinical observations gathered over centuries of practice. Its development
was inductive and looks at the human body's behavior as a whole during the
course of a disease. TCM defines a normal functioning person as having
balance within him or herself and with the natural environment outside the
body. In contrast, a diseased condition is a deviation from this balance
and the role of medical treatment, according to TCM, is to restore the
balanced state. Due to the subjective nature of TCM, it is a system that
needs modernization before it can be applied effectively in modern
healthcare.
From a systematic point of view, the TCM
model is very much like a black box. The outputs (physical symptoms and
signs) and inputs (pathogenic factors, herbs, diet, treatment) are
observed without the details of what is happening inside the body system.
Although the exact mechanisms are not presented, the black box method can
be suitable for open, large, and complex systems like the human body. The
inputs can be adjusted while the changes in the output can be observed
with reliable results over time. These observations can then develop
treatment inputs that bring the body back into balance. However, because
TCM lacks detailed and concrete mechanisms, it is difficult to conduct
meaningful scientific experimentation in the modern age. During diagnosis
and treatment, decisions are completely individualized for each patient
and the same protocol might not be repeatable for other patients. Thus,
the effectiveness of TCM can heavily depend on the skill and experience of
the practitioner and is not well suited for a generalized class of
disease.
The Western standard of double blind,
placebo controlled and randomized trials are not suited for the study of
TCM. In TCM, the diagnosis of the status of health or disease in a patient
is described by what is traditionally called Zhen (symptom-patterns.) The
nature of Zhen is a summary of the pathogenesis of a particular person at
a particular stage of a disease course. Zhen describes whether the
symptoms are hot or cold, internal or external, excessive or deficient and
summarizes them into patterns of Yin and Yang. Thus, Zhen is a summary of
the functional status of the patient and not a description of anatomy and
pathology. TCM treatment is based on using particular herbs to restore the
lost balance diagnosed by the Zhen, an example being using a
"cold" herb to balance a "hot" condition in the body.
The vague and mystical nature of TCM makes formal experimentation and
study difficult. From the modern microbiological point of view, Zhen does
not differentiate between the etiological factor (the cause of the
disease), which can make for inaccurate diagnosis since different diseases
may show the similar types of Zhen or symptoms. Without a reliable way to
determine the etiological factor, TCM treatment might not work well for
the infectious diseases unless it is properly diagnosed.
The herbal formulas used in TCM treatment
are also individualized and usually contain eight to twelve combinations
of herbs. Each herb within the combinations can also have dozens of
different active ingredients that may vary depending on the season, place
of production and other factors. This makes it very hard to standardize
the results of each batch and is another area that TCM needs
modernization.
Despite its seemingly out-dated methods,
the vast amount of accumulated information stored in TCM can provide
useful applications for treating modern diseases such as Hepatitis C. The
integration of TCM with modern methods is a key step towards better
healthcare. The next article will discuss Modern Chinese Medicine and it's
development. (Part 3)
|